Skip to main content

System Game Constellation

Field of application

Guided larger group #reflections on #system dynamics

 

Resume / Brief description

 

In most of our work as lecturers or as scientists we are explaining certain system dynamics. The context can be a value chain as a business relational system, local economic development as a system in a certain geographic space or even a business itself as a system of departments, employees, changing markets and demand etc.. Most systems are complex and interrelations in the system cannot always been traced back. The system game is a funny as well as insightful self-experience on how systems and interrelationships are affecting each other in a multidimensional way. Participants of the exercise stay in the beginning in a circle, have to select two persons in the circle between they have to position themselves once the moderator gives the signal. Different rounds of this game and joint reflections about observations provide an inside on how system dynamics function.

Target group

 

  1. Students and graduates that should reflect on certain system dynamics.
  2. Researchers and University departments that want to experience the system dynamics and who want to sensitize themselves on theior interdependence.
  3. With businesses and support organisations to sensitize them on the consideration of system dynamics and changes in the environment on which they have to react.

Objectives

The System Game aims to

  • Illustrate how a complex adaptive system works and how small changes can have a big effect
  • Experience that cause and effect in complex systems is separated in time, and there are typically multiple cause and effect relations that are weakly connected but that influence each other.
  • In complex living systems you are never sure who is following whom, and where the different stakeholders and system parts get their signals from to change their position
  • Learn that due to the interconnectedness of system relations it is very difficult to intervene in the system without running into the risk that the system responds in an unpredictable way.
  • Learn that the history of a system and the relationships between the stakeholders shape the present and the future.
  • Experience that nobody has the complete picture of the system. Communication and clarification is necessary but at the same time the relationships are changing continuously.

Requirements

Material

Time

 

  • Space for the exercise. It can be done in a larger class room, outside on a parking lot, in a garden or park
  • A flipchart for reflection in between the exercise

 

Time: 20 -30 min depending on the deepness of reflection.

Implementation - Overview

The methodology is realized in three main organisational steps. 

image-1618238879176.png

Implementation - Guidelines

 

 

 

 

The preparation is mainly the identification of a space large enough to freely make movements. Apart from that it is relevant to be aware of system dynamics and its explanation to the students or participants. The starting point of the exercise is that the students or the participants are building a circle in the room/ space.

 

1.      EXPLANATION OF THE RULES

 

1.1.  Explaining the relevance of system dynamics and how we are always acting in these dynamics

 

  • Ask the students what the term “system dynamics” mean and what systems are coming up in their mind
  • Explain that we often try to fix a system without really knowing the relations in the system
  • Ask participants: Imagine a network of stakeholders with many connections: what is happening when you shift or remove one stakeholder?

 

1.2.  Explanation of rules of exercise

  • All participants are already standing in a large circle in which they can all see each other
  • Everyone should choose two people in the circle without being recognised or saying anything. Please also do not look at the persons during the exercise. Tell them to put on a "Pokerface".

image-1618238896197.png

  • As soon as the moderator or teacher claps their hands, it is the task of all participants to position themselves between the two people they have chosen. If these two people move, each participant must also reposition himself/herself so that he/she is again between the two people (see graphic).

 

1.3.  Demonstration

  • The moderator or teacher selects two participants in the circle and names them. He asks them to move slowly in different directions in the room.
  • As soon as they move, he constantly repositions himself/herself between them.
  • It is emphasised once again that everybody has to continue the adjustment until the moderator claps his hands again.
  • If other people are in the way to be able move into the correct position, you will still try to move carefully into the correct position.  
  • When the moderator or teacher claps their hands again, all participants should stop moving and have to stay where they are (freeze). 

 

2.      EXERCISE & OBSERVATIONS

 

2.1.  First round of exercise

  • Moderator asks all participants once again whether they have understood the rules and whether they have chosen two people.
  • The moderator claps his hands and all participants take their positions. What will happen is the formation of a knot in which all participants stand very close together and move constantly.
  • The moderator reminds the group to keep positioning themselves until he/she claps into the hands again. 
  • When the moderator claps his/her hands, everyone in the group should stand where he/she stands (freeze).

 

2.2.  First round of reflection

  • “What do you observe? What is happening?”, is the question the moderator asks the group. In general, different answers are coming up, e.g. like “We are moving constantly.”, We are creating a knot?
  • The Moderator asks again what else they observe? Answers could e.g. be: It seems we are somehow connected.” I do not know why the others are moving and where the centre of movement is.” The feeling of the complexity of the system starts to emerge.
  • The moderator asks the group: Who thinks that he or she knows who is following them? They should say nothing but just raise their arm.
  • The moderator asks then: Please raise the arm, if you think that nobody is following you.

 

 

2.3.  Second round: Observe who is following you

  • The moderator asks all participants to go back to the circle.
  • The moderator then asks the persons to do the same exercise but trying to give attention to the potential persons who are following them. Can they identify of who is following them? At the same time the rule is that everybody has also at the same time position him-herself in between his/her previous selected two persons.
  • The moderator claps into the hand and the same positioning starts again like in the first round.
  • After two minutes the moderator claps into the hand to ask the participants to freeze again.

 

2.4.  Reflection on what has happened

  • Moderator asks again. What has happened? Further comments are coming from the participants.
  • Moderator asks: “Who thinks that he/she knows who is following her? Please raise your hand.”
  • Moderator asks: “Who thinks that she/he is not followed by anybody? Raise your hand.”

 

2.5.  Third round: Taking stakeholders out of the system

  • Moderator takes two persons from the centre of the group out of the centre and positions them somewhere else in the room while asking everybody else to stay where they are. The persons who have been taking out of the centre are now standing still in the next round. They are freezed for a moment.
  • Moderator gives the introduction that if he/she claps again into the hand the whole group of persons have to position themselves again between the two earlier selected persons. The persons who have been taking out of the group are now observers and have to see if they observe something and if they maybe identify persons that are following them.
  • What happens in general is that the knot gets further dissolved. If not, the moderator takes another person, who thinks that he/she is not followed, out of the group and positions this or even two persons into another corner of the space while the whole group has to adjust immediately.
  • Finally, the moderator asks the group for a last exercise. He chooses one person, who seems from the outside very much connected. He then asks the whole group to directly react on changes. At the same time everybody has the task to try to identify again who is following them. The moderator then takes the chosen person and moves with this one through the whole room or park. What happens normally is that the whole system of participants is moving again, and relations are becoming more visible.

 

2.6.  Third reflection on what has happened

  • The person asks again the whole group and the persons who have been repositioned: “What do you observe? What has happened? Observations are often that some persons who have formerly thought that they are not observed but now realize the persons that are following them. Additionally, some persons realize some other interdependencies.
  • Moderator asks the whole group again. “Who still thinks that she/he is not followed?” Then relations are getting dissolved and everybody says whom he followed.

 

3.      FINAL REFLECTION

 

3.1. Reflection of the whole exercise and insights

  • The flipchart is taking into the circle and upcoming observations are documented
  • Then moderator does a summary reflection: What did we observe in the first round? (e.g. knot, continuous movement without clear idea of who is following whom, etc., second round: dissolved knot, more clarification of some interrelations but no clarity about all relations, etc.), third round: persons in the system who think they are not followed are actually followed etc.)

 

3.2. Reflection on (additional) system dynamics aspects

  • Moderator asks then: What are the insights from this exercise on system dynamics? What does this tell us about the complexity of systems? Comments are documented again on the flipchart.
  • Moderator then gives also additional inputs on typical system dynamics (see bullet points under “Objectives” above)

 

3.3. Reflection on relevance for our work

  • The final reflection is on the relevance of these insights on our work (e.g. on value chains, on internal dynamics in sectors, business branches, etc.)

Example of application:

Sensitization on local economic development (LED) on a Summer Academy on Economic Development in Germany with international experts as well as in a SEPT Master Course class in Leipzig with students on a course of Local Economic Development

 

The participants of the Summer Academy are all coming from different countries, but they are all representatives of either private business organisations, public entities or support organisations. Also, the students at the Master Course have got experiences in different organisations. In both occasions, all of the participants have to imagine that they are now in a location to promote local economic development with very different stakeholders and different interests. The objective in this context is that participants learn that LED is about

 

  1. A complex task where relationships between key stakeholders are highly diverse and complex, often not visible really-
  2. Sensitizing for the importance to not only do a stakeholder analysis but specially to understand the interrelationships between the stakeholders
  3. Realizing that competitiveness of a locality does not only depend on the competitiveness of businesses. It requires relationships between businesses, service providers, support organisations and local government entities. Socio-cultural norms and values often define certain overall relational contexts
  4. Understanding better missing interrelations where it is possible to identify potential for cooperation

 

Finding a place to realize the system game

In the case of the Summer Academy the moderators decided to move into the park next to the training location.

 

Starting point

The group starts with a large circle and the introduction and rules of the exercise documented above.

 

Exercise itself

Impressions from the exercise itself through the round of reflections (left side Academy, right side Master Class)

 

                            image-1618238923648.png    image-1618238932230.png

                                  image-1618238946422.png  image-1618238961423.png

 

Final reflection on the  flipchart

 

image-1618238977420.png

 

Support

The system game requires especially facilitation through a moderator. It is also good to have a second moderator to document the final reflection on the flipchart. The group of participants should go beyond 12 people. It can also facilitated with persons with up to 50 persons to still manage a good reflection. 

Templates, Graphics for download

The system game does not need templates. The flipchart for summarizing reflections can be designed as a mind map (see above) or in a structured way along the reflection questions.

 

 

Additional format/references

Template and description of the tool by Mesopartner: Handout Systems Game.pdf